The Sound [sans] the Fury”: The efficacy of SoundCloud Audio feedback in the writing classroom
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Gould, J., & Day, P. (2013). Hearing you loud and clear: Student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 554–566. Doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.660131
Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2010). An analysis of students' perceptions of the value and efficacy of instructors' auditory and text-based feedback modalities across multiple conceptual levels. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 113-134. Doi: 10.2190/EC.43.1.g
Killoran, J.B. (2013). Reel-to-reel tapes, cassettes, and digital audio media: Reverberations from a half-century of recorded-audio response to student writing. Computers and Composition, 30(1), 37–49. Doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2013.01.001
Lunt, T., & Curran, J. (2010). “Are you listening please?” The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 759–769. Doi: 10.1080/02602930902977772
Merry, S., & Orsmond, P. (2008). Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education, 11. Doi: 10.3108/beej.11.3
Middleton, A., & Nortcliffe, A. (2010). Audio feedback design: Principles and emerging practice. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education & Lifelong Learning, 20(2), 208-223. Doi: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2010.036816
Munro, W., & Hollingworth, L. (2014). Audio feedback to physiotherapy students for viva voce: How effective is ‘the Living Voice’? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,1–14.
Reynolds, J., & Russell, V. (2008). Can you hear us now?: A comparison of peer review quality when students give audio versus written feedback. WAC Journal, 19, 29-44.
Sommers, J. (2012). Response rethought…again: Exploring recorded comments and the teacherstudent bond. Journal of Writing Assessment, 5(1).
Sommers, J. (2013). Response 2.0: Commentary on student writing for the new millennium. Journal of College Literacy & Learning, 39, 21-37.
Sommers, J., & Mellen, C. (2003). Audiotaped response and the two-year campus writing classroom: The two-sided desk, the ‘guy with the ax,' and the chirping birds. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 31(1), 25-39.