Supporting the Adoption of Technology Enhanced Learning by Academics at Universities
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM, (2011), ‘Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in child welfare’, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.
Armstrong, M. (2006), A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 10th ed., Kogan, London
Babbie, E. (2010), The Practice of Social Research’, 12th edition, Wadsworth: Cengage Publishing.
Beaty, E., Cousin, G. & Deepwell, F. (2002) Introducing e-learning via a community network: a teaching and learning strategy in action, Networked Learning Conference Proceedings, 26–28 March 2002, p. 36–40.
Barton, S, Corbitt, B, Nguyen, L and Peszynski, K (2007), 'Cultural factors behind the adoption of e-learning in turkey', in Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Toowoomba, Queensland, 5 - 7 December 2007.
Baxter & Jack, (2008) ‘Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers’ The Qualitative Report Volume 13(4), p.544559, Accessed 09/02/2015 from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf
Berta, W., Teare, G.F., Gilbart, E., Ginsburg, L.S., Lemieux-Charles, L., Davis, D., Rappolt, S., (2005) ‘The contingencies of organizational learning in long-term care: factors that affect innovation adoption’, Health Care Management Review Vol.30 (4), p.282-292.
Beetham, H., McGill, L. & Littlejohn, A. (2009) ‘Thriving in the 21st century: learning Literacies for the digital age (LliDA Project)’, JISC, Accessed 12/03/15 from http://www.caledonianacademy.net/spaces/LLiDA/uploads/Main/LLiDAreportJune09.pdf
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.) (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. London and New York: Routledge
Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R. (2013) Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning. 2nd edn, Routledge, New York
Betts, K. S. (1998). Factors influencing faculty participation in distance education in postsecondary education in the United States: an institutional study. Doctoral, George Washington University, Washington D.C., Accessed 12/03/15 from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=0&did=732907971&SrchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=13&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1175505505&clientId=165322
Betts, K. S. (1998). An institutional overview: factors influencing faculty participation in distance education in postsecondary education in the United States: an institutional study. Online journal of distance learning administration, Vol.1(3), 13. Accessed 12/03/15 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall13/betts13.pdff
Berge, Z. L., & Muilenburg, L. Y. (2003). Obstacles faced at various stages of capability regarding distance education in institutions of higher education: survey results. Accessed 12/11/14 from www.emoderators.com/barriers/hghred_stgs.shtml
Benz, C. and Newman, I. (1998). Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale
Browne, T., Hewitt, R., Jenkins, M., Voce, J., Walker, R. & Yip, H. (2010). ‘2010 survey of Technology Enhanced Learning For Higher Education in the UK’. A JISC/UCISA funded survey.
Burd, L. (2013) 2013 New Professors Talk with Liz Burd, University of Newcastle, Australia, accessed on 8/5/2015 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WckMZiEBe7o
Burke & Litwin, (1992) ‘A Causal Model of Organisation Performance and Change’, Journal of Management, Vol 18, No 3, p.523–545.
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, Vol.41(6), p.977-1002
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Calvert, J. (2005) Distance education at the crossroad, Distance Education, Vol.26(2), p.227–238.
Chen, B. (2009), ‘Barriers to adoption of technology-mediated distance education in higher-education institutions’, The Quarterly Review of Distance Learning, Vol.10(4), p.333-338.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K., (2007) ResearchMethodsinEducation, 6th Edition, London:Routledge-Falmer
Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap and others don’t. New York: HarperCollins.
Collis, B. & van der Wende, M. (2002) Models of technology and change in higher education, report, University of Twente, Accessed 12/11/14 from http://www.utwente.nl/cheps/documenten/ictrapport.pdf
Cummings, Rick, Phillips, Rob, Tilbrook, Tilda and Lowe, Kate (2005) Middle-out approaches to the reform of university teaching and learning: champions striding between the 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' approaches. The International Review of Research on Open and Distance Learning Vol 6 No 1. Accessed 12/11/14 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/224/307
Conole, G. (2002) The evolving landscape of learning technology research. ALT‐J 10(3), 4‐18
Damanpour and Schneider (2006), ‘Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers’, British Journal of Management, Volume 17, Issue 3, Accessed 12/11/14 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x/full
Dawson, P. (1994). Organizational change: A processual approach. London: Paul Chapman Publishing
Dooley, K., & Murphrey, T. (2000). How the Perspectives of Administrators, Faculty, and Support Units Impact the Rate of Distance Education Adoption. Online journal of distance learning administration Vol.3(4) http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter34/dooley34.pdf
Douglas, J.A. (2005). All globalization is local: Countervailing forces and the influence on higher education markets. Paper CSHE. Berkely, eScholarship Repository, University of California. Accessed 12/11/14 from http://repositories.cdlib.org/cshe/CSHE-1-05/
Dickson, T. (2004, February) Things to come, conference opening address at When worlds collide, JISC infoNet Conference, York (York, JISC infoNet and HEFCE).
De Freitas, S. & Oliver, M. (2005) Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organizational change to e-learning implementation, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol.27, 81.
European ODL Liaison Committee. (2004). Distance learning and elearning in European policy and practice: The vision and the reality. Accessed 01/02/15 from http://www.odlliaison.org/pages.php?PN=policypaperr
Elrod, P.D. II & Tippett, D.D. (2002), The “Death Valley of change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol.15(3), p.273-91.
Eisenhardt KM., (1989) Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 14(4)
Frost, S., & Chopp, R. (2004), ‘The university as global city: A new way of seeing today’s academy’, Change, 36(2), p.44–51.
Farrell, L. (2001) ‘Negotiating Knowledge in the Knowledge Economy: workplace educators and the politics of codification’, Studies in Continuing Education, Vol.23 (2), p.201‐214.
Friesen, N., Gourlay, L. & Oliver, M. (2014) ‘Editorial: scholarship and literacies in a digital age’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 21
Feldstein, A. C., & Glasgow, R. E. (2008), ‘A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice’, Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 34(4), p228–243.
Gartner, ‘Bimodal IT’ Accessed 01/02/15 http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/bimodal (2013)
Gallivan, M.J., (2001). Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: Development and application of a new framework. The database for Advances in Information Systems - Summer 2001, Vol. 32, No. 3, p.51-85.
Graham, R. J. (2006). Factors influencing faculty decisions to incorporate blended and totally online instruction at a private urban university. Doctor of Education, St. John's University, N.Y.
Gourlay, L., Hamilton, M. & Lea, M. (2014) ‘Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 21, p.21438.
Gilly, S. (2005) 'Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions', ALT-J, 13: 3, 201 — 218, Accessed 01/02/15 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687760500376439
Garrison, D & Vaughan, N. (2008), ‘Blended learning in higher education’, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, Vol.7(2), p.95–105.
Garrett, R. & Jokivirta, L. (2004) Online learning in commonwealth universities: selected data from the 2004 Observatory Survey, Part. 1, Report no. 20 (London, The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education).
Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-toeffectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), p.1261—1267.
Graham, I.; Logan, J. (2004). Innovation in Knowledge Transfer and Continuity of Care. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, Vol.36, 2, p.89-103
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994), “Competing paradigms in qualitative research”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research , Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, p.105-117.
Goodyear, P. (2005) Educational design and networked learning: patterns, pattern languages and design practice, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.21(1), p.82–101.
Holley, D. & Oliver, M. (2001). ‘Pedagogy and new power relationships’. International Journal of Management Education, Vol.1 (1), p.11‐21.
HEFCE (2005) HEFCE Strategy for E-Learning 2005/12. Bristol, UK, Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), Accessed 01/02/15 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/
Hammond, Nick (2003) Learning technology in higher education in the UK: Trends, drivers and strategies. In M. Van der Wende and M. van der Ven (eds), The use of ICT in Higher Education: A mirror of Europe. Lemma Publishers: Utrecht, p.109-122.
Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Ciccone, A. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Holmes, B. and Gardner, J. (2006), E-learning: Concepts and Practice, Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Jacobsen, D. M. (2000) ‘Examining Technology Adoption Patterns by Faculty in Higher Education’ Proceedings of ACEC2000: Learning Technologies, Teaching and the Future of Schools, July 6-9, Melbourne, Australia
Johnson, B. and Christensen, L. (2004). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, Research Edition, Second Edition Pearson Education Inc., Boston.
Kirriemuir, J. (2008). A spring 2008 ‘snapshot’ of UK Higher and Further Education developments in Second Life. Eduserv Virtual World Watch. Accessed 01/02/15 from http://www.scribd.com/doc/7063700/A-Spring-2008-snapshot-of-UK-Higher-andFurther-Education-Developments-in-Second-Life
Kirriemuir, J. (2010) ‘Virtual World Activity in UK Universities and Colleges: What now?’ Accessed 01/02/15 from http://virtualworldwatch.net/vww/wpcontent/uploads/2011/09/Snapshot-9.pdf
Kelton, A.J. (2007). Second Life: Reaching into the virtual world for real-world learning. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Accessed 01/02/15 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0717.pdf
Kelton, A.J. (2008). Virtual worlds? “Outlook good”. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(5), 15-22. Accessed 01/02/15 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0850.pdf
Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A. and Jick, T. D. (1992). The Challenge of Organizational Change. New York: Free Press.
Kotter, J. (2007) Leading Change: Why transformation efforts fail’, Harward Business Review, p.1-10
Kotter, Change Management blog, Accessed 01/02/15 from http://www.changemanagement-blog.com/2009/07/change-model-3-john-kotters-8-steps-of.html
Kotter, J.P. (1996), Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Kotter, J.P. and Cohen, D.S. (2002), The Heart of Change: Real Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Lane, C. A., & Lyle, H. F. (2011). Obstacles and supports related to the use of educational technologies: The role of technological expertise, gender, and age. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, Vol.23(1), 38–59.
Lewin, K. (1951), Field Theory in Social Science, Harper and Row, New York, NY
Larson, A. (2005). Lifelong learning at the international agenda - and its implementation in a Danish context. In S. Kiefer & T. Peterseil (Eds.), Analysis of educational policies in a comparative perspective, p123-140, Linz: Trauner Verlag.
Larson, A. (2006). Participation and non-participation in adult education and training. In S. Ehlers (Ed.), Milestones - towards lifelong learning systems (pp. 47-61). Copenhagen: Danish University of Education Press.
Lasswell, H (1948), ‘Power and Personality’, NY
Laurillard, D. (2004) The next level in e-learning, Proceedings of Online Educa Berlin, (Berlin, ICWE) p.452–455.
Laurillard, D. (2007), ‘The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies’, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Vol.4 (1) p.5-20, Accessed 01/02/15 from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/626/1/laurillard2009Thepedagogical.pdf
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field Theory in Social Science. London: Social Science Paperbacks.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers.
Lincoln, Y.S. (2001). The fourth generation view of evaluation: The future for evaluation in a new millennium. Keynote address at the 2001 Arizona Evaluation Network’s Spring Conference. Accessed 01/02/15 from http://aspin.asu.edu/azenet/fall01.html#yvonnaa
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (2000), ‘Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences’, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2nd ed., Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, p.163-188
McKinsey (2012) Quarterly, Accessed 01/02/15 from http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Organization/Change_Management/Economic_Conditions_Sn
Mays, N. and Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research, British Medical Journal 320(7226), p.50-52.
Marshek. R 1993, Lewin meets confucious, The Journal of applied behavioural Science, NTL institute, vol. 29 no. 4
Mendel, P., C. L. Damberg, M. E. S. Sorbero, D. M. Varda, and D. O. Farley (2008) ‘The Growth of Partnerships to Support Patient Safety Practice Adoption’, Health Services Research, Accessed 01/03/15 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2677037/
McEwen, M., & Wills, E.M. (2007). Theoretical Basis for Nursing 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Mitchell S., Fisher C., Hastings C., Silverman L. & Wallen G. (2010) A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: mapping the field. Nursing Outlook 58, p.287–300.
Morris, David (2008) Economies of scale and scope in e-learning. Studies in Higher Education. Vol 33 No 3 pp331-343
Mies, M., & Vandana, S. (1993). Ecofeminism. Melbourne: Spinifex.
Maguire, L. (2005). Literature review- faculty perception in online distance education: barriers and motivators. Online journal of distance education, Vol.8(1). Accessed 01/03/15 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/maguire81.htm
Nardi, and O’Day (1999). Information Ecologies. Using Technology with Heart. Cambridge, Massachusetts. MIT press.
Netteland G., Wasson B. and Morch A.I., 2007, E-learning in a large organization. A study of the critical role of information sharing, Journal of Workspace Learning, vol.19, no.6, pp.392-411
Nuendorf, K. (2002), ‘The Content Analysis Guidebooj’, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage
Oliver, M. & Dempster, J. (2003) ‘Embedding e-learning practices, in: R. Blackwell & P. Blackmore (Eds) Towards strategic staff development in higher education’ (Buckingham, SRHE and Open University Press), 142–153.
Onwuegbuzie, A. and Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Tashakkori A and Teddlie, C., Ed., Sage, Thousands Oaks.
OECD (2005) E-learning in tertiary education: where do we stand? Paris: OECD/CERI
Oldenburg B, Glanz K. Diffusion of innovations. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008m, p.313–333
Parker, A. (2003). Motivation and incentives for distance faculty. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol.6(3), 1-6, Accessed 01/03/15 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/parker63.htm
Picciano, A & Dziuban, C (2007), Blended learning: Research perspectives. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organisations; A resource dependency perspective. New York and San Fransisco: Harper & Row Publishers
Ritchie, J. and J. Lewis (2003), Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, London Sage.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). N.Y.: Free Press.
Rosenberg, M.J.E-l.e. (2001), earning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age, McGraw-Hill Professional, Boston, MA.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2000) Research methods for business students. 2nd edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Servage, L. (2005), ‘Strategizing for workplace e-learning: some critical considerations’, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 17 Nos 5/6, p.304-17
Seely-Brown, J. & Duguid, P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation, Organization Science, 2(1), p.40–57.
Solomons, N., & Spross, J. (2011). Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review. Journal Of Nursing Management, 19(1), p.109-120.
Smith, P. (2004). Curricular transformation: Why we need it and how to support it. Change, 36(1), p.28–35.
Salmon, G. (2005) Flying Not Flapping: A Strategic Framework for E-Learning and Pedagogical Innovation in Higher Education Institutions. ALT-J, 13:3, p.201-218.
Schiffman, Stephen, Vignare, Karen & Geith, Christine (2007) Why do higher education institutions pursue online education? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks Vol 11 No 2, pp61-71 Accessed 01/03/15 from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/jaln/v11n2/pdf/v11n2_schiffman.pdf
Sharpe, R. & Beetham, H. (2010) Understanding students’ uses of technology for learning: towards creative appropriation, in R. Sharpe, H. Beetham and S. de Freitas (Eds.) Rethinking learning for the digital age: how learners shape their experiences, p.85 – 99. RoutledgeFalmer, London and New York.
Stiles, M. (2004) Is an eLearning strategy enough?, Educational Developments, 5(1), p.13–15.
Simmons, D. E. (2002). The forum report: E-learning adoption rates and barriers. In A. Rossett (Ed.). The ASTD E-learning Handbook: Best practices, strategies and case studies for an emerging field, (pp. 19-23). New York: McGraw Hill.
Shaw, P. (2002) Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change. London: Routledge.
Tatnall, A. and Davey, B. (2003). “ICT and Training: A Proposal for an Ecological Model of Innovation”. Education Technology and Society. Vol. 6, No. 1, p.14‐17.
Trowler, P. (1998) Academics Responding to Change New Higher Education Frameworks and Academic Cultures, Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education Open University Press
Thanaraj & Williams, (2014) ‘Embedding Technology Enhanced Learning at Universities: A collaboration between University of Cumbria and Newcastle University; Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Special Edition on Digital Technology
UCISA report, 2010 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for higher education in the UK, Accessed 01/03/15 from http://www.ucisa.ac.uk/groups/ssg/~/media/groups/ssg/surveys/TEL%20survey%202010_FINAL.ashx
UCISA report, 2012 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning: case studies, Accessed 01/03/15 from http://www.ucisa.ac.uk/~/media/groups/ssg/surveys/TEL%20Survey%202012%20Case%20studies_FINAL
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, Washington, D.C., 2010, Accessed 01/03/15 from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html
Vankatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 42
Warburton, S. & Perez-Garcia, M. (2009). 3D design and collaboration in massively multi-user virtual environments. In D.Russel (Ed.), Cases on collaboration in virtual learning environments: processes and interactions. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Yin, R. K.: Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Sage publications, Newbury Park, CA. (1994).
Welsh, E., Wanberg, C., Brown, K. and Simmering, M. (2003), ‘E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions’, International Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 7 No. 4, p. 245-258.