The Impact of Technology on Student Perceptions of Instructor Comments
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Bardine, B. (1999, April/May). Students’ perceptions of written teacher comments: What do they say about how we respond to them? High School Journal, 82(4), 239.
Bardine, B. A., Bardine, M. S., & Deegan, E. F. (2000). Beyond the red pen: Clarifying our role in the response process. The English Journal, 90(1), 94-101.
Elbow, P. & Belanoff, P. (1989). Sharing and Responding. New York: Random.
Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
Fife, J. M., & O’Neill, P. (2001, December). Moving beyond written comment: Narrowing the gap between response practice and research. College Composition and Communicatioin, 53, 300321.
Lunsford, R. F., & Straub, R. (2006). Twelve readers reading: A survey of contemporary teachers’ commenting strategies. In R. Straub (Ed.), Key works on teacher response (pp. 157189). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Monroe, B. (2002, September). Feedback: Where it’s at is where it’s at. The English Journal, 92(1), 102-104.
Monroe, B. (2003, January). How E-mail can give you back your life. The English Journal, 92(3), 116-118.
Popovich, M. N., & Masse, M. H. (2005, Summer). Individual assessment of media writing student attitudes: Recasting the Mass Communication Writing Apprehension Measure. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 339-355.
Sommers, N. (1982, May). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 148-156.
Wiltse, E. M. (2002, Summer). Correlates of college students’ use of instructors’ comments. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 57(2), 126-138.
Wiltse, E. M. (2006, Summer). Using writing to predict students’ choices of majors. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 2(61), 179-194.