Strategies for engagement in online courses
Main Article Content
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
Davidson, C. N. (2011). Now you see it: How the brain science of attention will transform the way we live, work, and learn. New York: Viking.
Johnson, B. (2012). How do we know when students are engaged? Edutopia. Retrieved May 21, 2012 from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/student-engagement-definition-ben-johnson.
Kinzie, J. (2010). Student engagement and learning: Experiences that matter. In J. Christensen Hughes and J. Mighty (Eds), Taking stock: Research on teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 1390153). Kingston, Canada: School of Public Policies, Queens University at Kingston.
Newmann, F. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Quality Matters (2011). Retrieved March 2, 2013 from http://www.qmprogram.org/lit-review2011-2013-rubricpdf/download/QM%20Lit%20Review%20for%202011-2013%20Rubric.pdf.
Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2009). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities, Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 185-209.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Porter, S. (2009). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 47(5), 521-558.
Roediger, H. L., III, Gallo, D. A., & Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 10, 319–332.
Swan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68-82.