Does contiguous effect matter in PowerPoint presentations for effective instruction?

Main Article Content

Ju Park

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Park, J. (2013). Does contiguous effect matter in PowerPoint presentations for effective instruction?. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 2(1), 69–72. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt/article/view/3309
Section
Quick Hits
Author Biography

Ju Park, Indiana University-Northwest

Assistant Professor of Education

References

Alkazemi, E. (2003). The effect of the instructional sequence of a computer simulation and a traditional laboratory on middle grade students’ conceptual understanding of an electrochemistry topic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Florida.

Bitter, G., & Legacy, J. (2008). Using technology in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Demirbilek, M. (2004). Effects of interface windowing modes and individual differences on disorientation and cognitive load in a hypermedia learning environment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida, Florida.

Ellis, T.J. (2001). Multimedia enhanced educational products as a tool to promote critical thinking in adult students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(2), 107-123.

Grace-Martin, M. (2001). How to design educational multimedia: A "loaded" question. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10(4), 397-409.

Hack, G. (2004). Effects of a narrative instructional strategy on knowledge acquisition and retention from a nutrition education video. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida, Florida.

Johnson, C., & Mayer, R.E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–191.

Lin, H. Y. (2006). From audio to audiovisual: A discussion of museum planning for mobile multimedia guides. Museology Quarterly, 20(1), 97-114.

Martin-Michiellot, S., & Mendelsohn, P. (2000). Cognitive load while learning with a graphical computer interface. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 284-293.

Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning & Instruction, 12(1), 107-119.

Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.

Most, T., & Greenbank, A. (2000). Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual perception of emotions by adolescents with and without learning disabilities, and their relationship to social skills. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(4), 171-178.

O’Bannon, B., & Puckett, K. (2010). Preparing to use technology: A practical guide to curriculum integration. Boston: Pearson.

Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Exploring the practice and development of generic skills through web-based learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(3), 207225.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.

Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Fu¨rstenberg, A., Scheiter, K., & Zindler, A. (2011). The perceptual basis of the modality effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(2), 159–173.

Schuler, A., Scheiter, K., Rummer, R., & Gerjets, P. (April, 2012). Explaining the modality effect in multimedia learning: Is it due to a lack of temporal contiguity with written text and pictures? Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 92-102.

Shaw, T. (2003, November). Dodging the bullets: The danger of reductionism in the PowerPoint presentations. Multimedia Schools, 10(6), 43-47. Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://search.epnet.com/direct.asp?an=11355901&db=aph.