Using iAnnotate to enhance feedback on written work
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Bjorkman, M. (1972). Feedforward and feedback as determiners of knowledge and policy: Notes on a neglected issue. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 152-158.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
Brown, S., Bull, J., & Race, P. (Eds.). (1999). Computer Assisted Assessment in Higher Education. London, Routledge.
Burke, D. (2009). Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 41–50.
Buzzetto-More, N. A., & Alade, A.J. (2006). Best practices in e-assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 251-269.
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407.
Chang, Ni, Watson, A.B., Bakerson, M.A., Williams, E.E., McGroon, F.A., & Spitzer, B. (2012). Electronic feedback or handwritten feedback: What do undergraduate students prefer and why? Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(1), 1-23.
Cowan, J. (2003). Assessment for learning—giving timely and effective feedback. Exchange, 4, 21-22.
Denton, P. (2001). Generating coursework feedback for large groups of students using MS Excel and MS Word. University Chemistry Education, 5, 1-8.
Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. (2008). Students’ responses to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500.
Duncan, N. (2007). Feed-forward: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 271-283.
Draper, S. (2009). What are learners actually regulating when giving feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 306–315.
Faris, M. J. (2010). Using iAnnotate to grade [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://blogs.tlt.psu.edu/projects/ipad/2010/10/using-iannotate-to-grade.html
Heinrich, E. (2007). E-learning support for essay-type assessments. In N.A. Buzzetto-More (ed), Principles of Effective Online Teaching. Santa Rosa: Informing Science Press.
Heinrich, E., Milne, J., Ramsay, A., & Morrison, D. (2009). Recommendations for the use of etools for improvements around assignment marking quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 469–479.
Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H., & Thorpe, L. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 117-127.
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269-74.
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53-64.
Hounsell D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research and Development, 27, 55-67.
Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Abingdon: Routledge.
Jones, J. B. (2010, June 4). Mark up PDFs on Your iPad: iAnnotate PDF [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/mark-up-pdfs-on-your-ipad-iannotate-pdf/24500
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263-75.
McNeill, M., Gosper, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Assessment choices to target higher order learning outcomes: The power of academic empowerment. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 283-96.
Miller, M., Linn, R., & Gronlund, N. (2012). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching (11th edition). Columbus: Pearson.
Monroe, B. (2002). Feedback: Where it’s at is where it’s at. The English Journal, 92(1), 102-104.
Mutch, A. (2003). Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 24–38.
Nesbit, P., & Burton, S. (2006). Student justice perceptions following assignment feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(6), 655–670.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199218.
Nicol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(3), 335–352.
Poulos, A., & Mahony, M.J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.
Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231–240.
Sadler, D. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.
Sample, M. (2011, November 8). Making the Most of iAnnotate on the iPad [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/making-the-most-of-iannotate-on-theipad/37091
Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 67-78.
Ward, D. (2012, June 19). Grading with voice on an iPad [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/grading-with-voice-on-an-ipad/40907
Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394.
Wojtas, O. (1998). Feedback? No, just give us the answers. Times Higher Education Supplement, September 25.