Rubrics on the Fly: Improving Efficiency and Consistency with a Rapid Grading and Feedback System
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Teachers.org. (2012, 3 7). RubiStar Home. Retrieved 3 7, 2012, from RubiStar: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/
Abdullah, T., Mateen, A., Sattar, A. R., & Mustafa, T. (2010). Risk Analysis of Various Phases of Software. European Journal of Scientific Research, 40(3), 369-373.
Andrade, H. G. (2000). What Do We Mean by Results? Using Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
Andrade, H. G. (2005, Winter). Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27-31.
Anglin, L., Anglin, K., Schumann, P., & Kaliski, A. (2008). Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Grading Through the Use of Computer-Assisted Grading Rubrics. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 51-73.
Atkinson, D., & Lim, S. (2013). Improving assessment processes in Higher Education: Student and teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of a rubric embedded in a LMS. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5), 651-666.
Avison, D. E., & Fitzgerald, G. (2003). Where now for development methodologies? Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 78-82.
Beynon-Davies, P. M. (2000, July). ‘It’s lots of bits of paper and ticks and post-it notes and things . . .’: a case study of a rapid application development project. Information Systems Journal, 10(3), 195-216.
Butler, D. A. (2011). Closing the loop 21st century style: providing feedback on written assessment via MP3 recordings. Journal of Australasian Law Teachers Association, 4 (1&2), 99-107.
CampusComputing. (2013). A Profile of the LMS Market. The national Survey of Computing and Information Technology, 1-35.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2008). Selecting Development Approach. Retrieved from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SystemLifecycleFramework/Downloads/SelectingDevelopmentApproach.pdf
Cheang, B., Kurnia, A., Lim, A., & Oon, W.-C. (2003). On automated grading of programming assignments is an academic institution. Computers & Education 41, 121-131.
Chen, P. M. (2004, May). An Automated Feedback System for Computer Organization Projects. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(2), 232-240.
Cooper, B. S., & Gargan, A. (2009). Rubrics in Education Old Term, New Meanings. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(1), 54-55.
Cross, P. K. (1990). Teaching to Improve Learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 9-22.
Davis, F. D. (1989, September). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Dornisch, M. M., & McLoughlin, A. S. (2006). Limitations of web-based rubric resources: Addressing the challenges. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11, 1-8.
Goodrich, H. (1997, January). Teaching for Student Performance. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 14-17.
Hall, R., Butler, L., McGuire, S., McGlynn, S., Lyon, G., Reese, R., & Limbach, P. (2001). Automated, Web-Based, Second-Chance Homework. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(12), 1704.
He, Y., Hui, S. C., & Quan, T. T. (2009). Automatic summary assessment for intelligent tutoring systems. Computers & Education, 53, 890-899.
Howell, R. (2011). Exploring the Impact of Grading Rubrics on Academic Performance: Findings From a Quasi-Experimental, Pre-Post Evaluation. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22(2), 31-49.
Klein, J., & El, L. P. (2010). Impairment of teacher efficiency during extended sessions of test correction. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(3), 379-392.
Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology.
Machado, M., & Tao, E. (2007). Blackboard vs. moodle: Comparing user experience of learning management systems. Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports, (pp. 7-12). doi:10.1109/FIE.2007.4417910
Mackay, H., Carne, C., Beynon-Davies, P., & Tudhope, D. (2000, October). Reconfiguring the User: Using Rapid Application Development. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 737-757.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. C., & Guarino, J. A. (2005). Applied Multivariate Research: Design. Sage Publications, Inc.
Miser, H., & Quade, E. (1988). Handbook of Systems Analysis: Craft Issues and Procedural Choices. USA: Wiley.
Necco, C. R., Gordon, C. L., & Tsai, N. W. (1987, December). Systems Analysis and Design: Current Practices. MIS Quarterly, 11(4), 461-476.
Ramey, S., VandeVusse, L., & Gosline, M. (2007). Using a Written Communication Rubric to Improve Students' Writing. International Journal of Learning, 13(10), 67-74.
Riddle, E., & Smith, M. (2008). Developing and Using Rubrics in Quantitative Business Courses. The Coastal Business Journal, 7(1), 82-95.
Spinellis, D., Zaharias, P., & Vrechopoulos, A. (2007). Coping With Plagiarism and Grading Load: Randomized Programming Assignments and Reflective Grading. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 15(2), 113-123.
TeacherPlanet.com. (2012, 3 7). Rubrics for Teachers. Retrieved 3 7, 2012, from Teacher Planet: http://www.rubrics4teachers.com/
TeAch-nology. (2012, 3 7). Rubrics and Rubric Makers. Retrieved 3 7, 2012, from teAchnology: http://www.teach-nology.com/web_tools/rubrics/
Thompson, M., & Ahn, B. (2012). The Development of an Online Grading System for Distributed Grading in a Large First Year Project-Based Design Course. American Society for Engineering Education, 2012-3467.
US Department of Justice. (2012, 3 7). DOJ Systems Development Life Cycle Guidance Chapter 1. Retrieved 3 7, 2012, from US Department of Justice: http://www.justice.gov/jmd/irm/lifecycle/ch1.htm
Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The Role of Rubrics in Advancing and Assessing Student Learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3-14.