Electronic feedback or handwritten feedback: What do undergraduate students prefer and why?

Main Article Content

Ni Chang
A. Bruce Watson
Michelle A. Bakerson
Emily E. Williams
Frank X. McGoron
Bruce Spitzer

Abstract

Giving feedback on students’ assignment is, by no means, new to faculty. Yet, when it comes to handwritten feedback delivered in person and typed feedback delivered electronically to students, faculty may not know what undergraduate students prefer and reasons behind their preferences. The present study explored which form of feedback, i.e., electronic or handwritten feedback, undergraduate students preferred and rationale behind their preferences. Two hundred fifty respondents completed an online survey, which consisted of three closed-ended questions and two open-ended questions. Nonparametric tests were used to analyze the quantitative data. Qualitative responses were read and analyzed by four researchers and six themes were identified. The qualitative data were rechecked against the six themes independently first and then collectively. Discrepancies were discussed before complete consensus was made. The study found that nearly 70% of the participants preferred e-feedback for its accessibility, timeliness, and legibility. Yet, with respect to the quality of feedback, the majority of handwritten supporters chose handwritten feedback, as they perceived this type of feedback as more personal. The article discusses the marked discrepancies between the two groups and ends with educational implications and suggestions for future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chang, N., Watson, A. B., Bakerson, M. A., Williams, E. E., McGoron, F. X., & Spitzer, B. (2012). Electronic feedback or handwritten feedback: What do undergraduate students prefer and why?. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 1(1), 1–23. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt/article/view/2043
Section
Articles

References

Bai, X., & Smith, M. B. (2010). Promoting hybrid learning through a sharable elearning approach, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(3),13-24.

Bakerson, M., (2009). Persistence and success: A study of cognitive, social, and institutional factors related to retention of Kalamazoo Promise recipients at Western Michigan University. Ph.D. dissertation, Western Michigan University, United States -- Michigan. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations & Theses Database: A&I (Publication No. AAT 3392137).

Bjorkman, M. (1972). Feedforward and feedback as determiners of knowledge and policy: Notes on a neglected issue. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 152–8.

Bridge, P., & Appleyard, R. (2008). A comparison of electronic and paper-based assignment submission and feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 644-650.

Brown, J. (2007). Feedback: The student perspective. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12(1), 33–51.

Case, S. (2007). Reconfiguring and realigning the assessment feedback processes for an undergraduate criminology degree. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 285–99.

Chang, N. (2011). Pre-Service teachers’ views: How did e-feedback through assessment facilitate their learning? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 16-33.

Chang, N., & Petersen, N. J. (2006). Cybercoaching: An emerging model of personalized online assessment. In D. D. Williams, S. L. Howell, & M. Hricko (Eds.), Online assessment, measurement, and evaluation: Emerging practices (pp. 110–130). Hershey, PA: the Idea Group.

Charmaz, C. (2000) Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. London, Sage.

Cobb, R. Jr., Graham T, Kapur A, Rhodes, C, & Blackwell E. (2005, December). Give better feedback on engineering drawings. Tech Directions, 19-21.

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research design. London, Sage.

Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. (2008). Students’ response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500.

Dickinson, P. F. (1992, October). Feedback that works: Using the computer to respond. Paper presented at the Annual National Basic Writing Conference. College Park, MD. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED35649)

Duncan, N. (2007). Feed forward: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 271–283.

Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51–62.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–31.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. http://growthmindseteaz.org/files/Power_of_Feedback_JHattie.pdf

Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback, Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269-274.

Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2007). Annual national student survey. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/hefce/2007/nss.htm

Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Bridging the gap between expert-novice differences: The model-based feedback approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 103-117.

Krause, U., & Stark, R. (2010). Reflection in example- and problem-based learning: Effects of reflection prompts, feedback and cooperative learning. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(4), 255-272.

Limniou, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Teachers' and students' perspectives on teaching and learning through virtual learning environments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 645653.

Mertler, C. A., & Vanatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (3rd ed.) Glendale, CA: Pyrzcak Publishing.

Morgan P., & Toledo, C. (2006). Online feedback and student perceptions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 333-340.

Murtagh, L., & Baker, N. (2009). Feedback to feedforward: Students’ response to tutors’ written comments on assignments. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3(1), 20-28.

National Curriculum Task Group on Assessment and Testing: A Report. (1987). Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office. Kings College, London. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/01/54/36/TGATreport.pdf

National Union of Students (NUS) (2008). Student Experience Report. Retrieved from http://aces.shu.ac.uk/employability/resources/NUSStudentExperienceReport.pdf

Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.

Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2007). Enhancing practice. Retrieved from http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/IntegrativeAssessment/IAManaging.pdf.

Rosenberg, K. M. (2007). The Excel Statistics Companion. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.

Scott, G. (2006). Accessing the Student Voice: A Higher Education Innovation Program Project. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training.

Seliem, S., & Ahmed, A. (2009, March). Missing: Electronic Feedback in Egyptian EFL Essay Writing Classes. Online Submission, Paper presented at the Centre for Developing English Language Teaching (CDELT) Conference, Cairo, Egypt.

Siew, P. F. (2003). Flexible on-line assessment and feedback for teaching linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 34(1), 43-52.

Sinclair, H., & Cleland, J. (2007). Undergraduate medical students: Who seeks formative feedback? Medical Education, 41, 580–582. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.13652923.2007.02768.x/asset/j.1365-2923.2007.02768.x.pdf?v=1&t=h1dxgkhr&s=98da8e0463e211288733384af16aa4a5be4c643a

Stevenson, J. P. (2007). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Store, R. E., & Armstrong, J. D. (1981). Personalizing feedback between teacher and student in the context of a particular model of distance teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 140-157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.1981.tb00420.x

Winter, C., & Dye, V. L. (2004). An investigation into the reasons why students do not collected marked assignments and the accompanying feedback. CELT Learning and Teaching Project.

Yang, Y., & Durrington, V. (2010). Investigation of students' perceptions of online course quality. International Journal on E-Learning, 9(3), 341-361.