Electronic feedback or handwritten feedback: What do undergraduate students prefer and why?
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology (JoTLT) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in JoTLT.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoTLT publications, JoTLT encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoTLT, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JoTLT.
References
Bai, X., & Smith, M. B. (2010). Promoting hybrid learning through a sharable elearning approach, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(3),13-24.
Bakerson, M., (2009). Persistence and success: A study of cognitive, social, and institutional factors related to retention of Kalamazoo Promise recipients at Western Michigan University. Ph.D. dissertation, Western Michigan University, United States -- Michigan. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations & Theses Database: A&I (Publication No. AAT 3392137).
Bjorkman, M. (1972). Feedforward and feedback as determiners of knowledge and policy: Notes on a neglected issue. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 152–8.
Bridge, P., & Appleyard, R. (2008). A comparison of electronic and paper-based assignment submission and feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 644-650.
Brown, J. (2007). Feedback: The student perspective. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12(1), 33–51.
Case, S. (2007). Reconfiguring and realigning the assessment feedback processes for an undergraduate criminology degree. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 285–99.
Chang, N. (2011). Pre-Service teachers’ views: How did e-feedback through assessment facilitate their learning? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 16-33.
Chang, N., & Petersen, N. J. (2006). Cybercoaching: An emerging model of personalized online assessment. In D. D. Williams, S. L. Howell, & M. Hricko (Eds.), Online assessment, measurement, and evaluation: Emerging practices (pp. 110–130). Hershey, PA: the Idea Group.
Charmaz, C. (2000) Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. London, Sage.
Cobb, R. Jr., Graham T, Kapur A, Rhodes, C, & Blackwell E. (2005, December). Give better feedback on engineering drawings. Tech Directions, 19-21.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research design. London, Sage.
Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. (2008). Students’ response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500.
Dickinson, P. F. (1992, October). Feedback that works: Using the computer to respond. Paper presented at the Annual National Basic Writing Conference. College Park, MD. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED35649)
Duncan, N. (2007). Feed forward: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 271–283.
Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51–62.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–31.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. http://growthmindseteaz.org/files/Power_of_Feedback_JHattie.pdf
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback, Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269-274.
Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2007). Annual national student survey. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/hefce/2007/nss.htm
Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Bridging the gap between expert-novice differences: The model-based feedback approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 103-117.
Krause, U., & Stark, R. (2010). Reflection in example- and problem-based learning: Effects of reflection prompts, feedback and cooperative learning. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(4), 255-272.
Limniou, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Teachers' and students' perspectives on teaching and learning through virtual learning environments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 645653.
Mertler, C. A., & Vanatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (3rd ed.) Glendale, CA: Pyrzcak Publishing.
Morgan P., & Toledo, C. (2006). Online feedback and student perceptions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 333-340.
Murtagh, L., & Baker, N. (2009). Feedback to feedforward: Students’ response to tutors’ written comments on assignments. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3(1), 20-28.
National Curriculum Task Group on Assessment and Testing: A Report. (1987). Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office. Kings College, London. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/01/54/36/TGATreport.pdf
National Union of Students (NUS) (2008). Student Experience Report. Retrieved from http://aces.shu.ac.uk/employability/resources/NUSStudentExperienceReport.pdf
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2007). Enhancing practice. Retrieved from http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/IntegrativeAssessment/IAManaging.pdf.
Rosenberg, K. M. (2007). The Excel Statistics Companion. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.
Scott, G. (2006). Accessing the Student Voice: A Higher Education Innovation Program Project. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training.
Seliem, S., & Ahmed, A. (2009, March). Missing: Electronic Feedback in Egyptian EFL Essay Writing Classes. Online Submission, Paper presented at the Centre for Developing English Language Teaching (CDELT) Conference, Cairo, Egypt.
Siew, P. F. (2003). Flexible on-line assessment and feedback for teaching linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 34(1), 43-52.
Sinclair, H., & Cleland, J. (2007). Undergraduate medical students: Who seeks formative feedback? Medical Education, 41, 580–582. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.13652923.2007.02768.x/asset/j.1365-2923.2007.02768.x.pdf?v=1&t=h1dxgkhr&s=98da8e0463e211288733384af16aa4a5be4c643a
Stevenson, J. P. (2007). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Store, R. E., & Armstrong, J. D. (1981). Personalizing feedback between teacher and student in the context of a particular model of distance teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 140-157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.1981.tb00420.x
Winter, C., & Dye, V. L. (2004). An investigation into the reasons why students do not collected marked assignments and the accompanying feedback. CELT Learning and Teaching Project.
Yang, Y., & Durrington, V. (2010). Investigation of students' perceptions of online course quality. International Journal on E-Learning, 9(3), 341-361.