Creating a technology-rich associate degree program in office administration

Main Article Content

Allison White
Leanna R. Hostetler

Abstract

Providing ideas to others who wish to explore the process of making a degree program technology rich is critical to faculty who are building best practice programs. Technology rich is defined here as technology-filled environments and curriculum that include innovative hardware and software combined with technologically enhanced activities and assessments. This literature review reveals a research gap in several areas relating to best practices with respect to the impact of integrating technology into teaching and learning. More quantitative studies that discuss research methodology and professional development in technological pedagogy are needed. Often research efforts have yielded no common definitions, significant differences, or guidelines to measure effectiveness. This article posits arguments for a more systematic study of how technology integration occurs within our schools, what increases its adoption by teachers, and the long-term impacts that these investments have on both teachers and students (Lawless & Pellegrino, 2007). In addition to the program background and findings on technology in education, this article also articulates a case example of a technology implementation in an associate degree program. Concluding with the students’ perspective, insight is offered into this program’s continued effort to bridge the gap of the digital divide for a student population of predominantly rural, underserved, and disadvantaged through a student-focused atmosphere and curriculum (Goode, 2010). A technology transformation and semester transition of an Associate of Applied Business degree program for office administration (OA) in rural Ohio is delineated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
White, A., & Hostetler, L. R. (2014). Creating a technology-rich associate degree program in office administration. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 3(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v3n1.4093
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Allison White, Ohio University - Chillicothe

Professor White (M. Ed - Technology Education) is a full-time, tenure-track faculty member at Ohio University and coordinator of the Office Technology program. She teaches across the curriculum of the associate degree. Her research interests include:  teaching with technology interdisciplinary opportunities, and matching curriculum with student outcomes in today’s job market.

Leanna R. Hostetler, Ohio University-Chillicothe

Leanna Hostetler is a graduate of the Office Technology A.A.B. program and Health Services Administration B.S. program at Ohio University.  She is currently employed with Adena Regional Medical Center in Chillicothe, Ohio.

References

Agee, A. S. & Holisky, D. A. (2000, October). Technology across the curriculum. Educause Quarterly, 4. Retrevied from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0041.pdf

Bates, A. W & Poole, G. (2003) Effective teaching with technology in higher education: foundations for success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Cohen, E. B. (2002). Challenges of information technology education in the 21st century. Mishawaka, IN: Idea Group Publishing IGI-Global.

Goode, J. (2010). The digital identity divide: how technology knowledge impacts college students. New Media Society, 12(3), 497-513. doi: 10.1177/1461444809343560

Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. P., (1995). Teaching with technology. In A. C. Ornstein. (Ed.), Teaching:Theory into Practice (pp. 154-170). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

IT Governance, (2014). SDLC – system development life cycle. IT Governance Online. Retrieved from http://www.itgovernanceonline.com/it-governance/sdlc-system-development-life-cycle/

Johnson, S. D., (1992). A framework for technology education curricula which emphasizes intellectual processes. Journal of Technology Education, 3(2) 26-36.

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575-614. doi: 10.3102/0034654307309921

Marzano, R.J., Brandt, R.S., Hughes, C.S., Jones, B.F., Presseisen, B.Z., Rankin, S.C., Suthor, C. (1988), Dimension of Thinking: A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA,

Musawi, A. S. (2011). Redefining technology role in education. Creative Education, 2(2), 130135. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.22018

Ohio University. (2013). Q2S: Quarters to semesters information and faqs for currently enrolled students. Retrieved from https://www.ohio.edu/students/q2s/

Schachter, R. (2009, November). Mobile devices in the classroom: phones, netbooks and iPods are finding a place in the curriculum and expanding student access to technology. Professional Media Group LLC. Retrieved from http://www.districtadministration.com/article/mobiledevices-classroom

Sorcinelli, M. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, Massachusetts: Anker Publishing Company.

Stanford. (2013). Technology in the workplace. Retrieved from http://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/effect-on-interpersonal-skills/Work1.htm

Stroman, J., Wilson, K., Wauson, J. (2011). Administrative assistant’s and secretary’s handbook. AMACOM, 4th edition.

U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Occupational outlook handbook, 2012-13: Secretaries and administrative assistants. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/office-and-administrative-support/secretaries-and-administrativeassistants.htm

United States Department of Education. (2014). Use of technology in teaching and learning. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/oii-news/use-technology-teaching-and-learning